Books You Should Buy

  

« New Jersey Cesarean Refusal Case: The "System" is Schizophrenic | Refusal of Unnecesarean Leads to Loss of Custody: V's Story »
Tuesday
Jul212009

Skol v. Pierce Update: Doctor Fined and Placed on Probation

 

Chicago Breaking News reported yesterday that Dr. Scott Pierce, who was accused of mistreating Catherine Skol in labor with her fifth child on March 1, 2008, was fined $500 and placed on one year’s probation by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation.

According to the article, Rush University Medical Center later disciplined Pierce and his clinical privileges and medical staff membership were suspended. In addition, Pierce “was ordered to complete classes on physician-patient communication and behavior, as well as continuing medical education courses. He must notify the agency of any complaint, dispute, arrest, civil action or formal or informal disciplinary action, and file periodic reports to the agency.”

Pierce resigned on February 18, 2009.

Skol’s attorney, Kathleen Zellner, was reported as saying Skol will proceed with her lawsuit.

 

Catherine Skol’s allegations against Scott Pierce in the Cook County civil lawsuit, Skol v. Pierce, are summarized as follows:

Pierce arrived at the Rush University Medical Center at 8:10 a.m. on March 1, 2008, and immediately asked Skol, “Did you call anyone before you came in?” When Skol told him that her regular doctor had not instructed her to call first, Pierce responded with words to the effect of, “By law someone has to cover for the doctor. And people need to plan. You should know better since this is your fifth child. You should have come in sooner at ten to fifteen minute contractions rather than eight minutes.” Pierce complained that he had to arrive in a matter of minutes but it had been over four hours since he was first called. His drive took approximately eighteen minutes.

Over the next two to two and a half hours, Pierce would not let the patient have an epidural or any other pain medication. He told Skol and her husband that the baby would be born in ten minutes, which he knew or should have known was false, given Skol’s degree of dilation. Even after the baby was not born in ten minutes, Pierce still didn’t let her have an epidural or any other pain medication, just letting her suffer all that time unnecessarily.

Pierce repositioned Skol in the stirrups so that her toes were turned in (pigeon toed) and her buttocks were no longer on the table. This positioning required Skol to support herself with her arms. Despite her repeated requests to be repositioned because her right leg was cramping, and she had two herniated disks in her back, Pierce refused and made her remain in this position until he left the room after the delivery.

Pierce would not answer any of the Skol’s questions and would interrupt her repeated saying “Shut up, close your mouth, and push.”

At one point during the delivery, Skol was in the middle of a very strong contraction when Pierce decided to perform a vaginal exam. Skol specifically stated, “No. Stop!” Pierce refused and performed a very rough vaginal exam causing Skol extreme pain.

Pierce proceeded to ask for a “hook” and break Skol’s water bag. Pierce told the other doctor present that the water bag broke spontaneously, without admitting that he artificially ruptured Skol’s membranes with a hook. Pierce again stated that the baby was going to be here in ten minutes.

Pierce told the Skol that she was probably going to hemorrhage and that the blood had better be ordered. At that time, the chances that the baby was going to be born in ten minutes were zero.

Skol was extremely frightened by the statements. Pierce specifically stated that both she and her unborn baby might die. Skol had experienced a stillbirth several years before which was very traumatic for her and her husband.

After the room was prepared for delivery, Pierce took a seat on a stool between Skol’s legs at her perineum and requested that the other doctor sit next to him.

Pierce then took a phone call from a resident on his cell phone. Pierce proceeded to talk at great length during his phone call about an abortion he was going to be performing that day. Pierce scolded the resident on the other end of the call for taking heart tones on a baby that the resident was about to abort. The conversation was overheard by everyone in the room, because Pierce spoke in a very loud voice.

Skol was shocked by Pierce’s statements and continued to feel fearful for her life and that of her unborn child.

Despite Skol’s request to see the fetal monitor so she could control her pushing, Pierce would not allow her to see it. When the nurse tried to turn the monitor so the Skol could see, Pierce yelled at her to stop. He said, “Do not help her.”

Pierce repeatedly said words to the effect of, “there is only one voice in this room and it is mine.” No one else was permitted to speak. When the Skol tried to ask questions she was again told to, “shut up, shut your mouth and push.”

Pierce, by keeping the Skol in the stirrups for at least 1½ hours, greatly increased her risk of deep vein thrombosis, in addition to greatly increasing her physical pain.

Despite Pierce’s representations that the Skol was dilated to eight centimeters at 8:15 a.m. when he left the room one hour after that, the other doctor checked Skol and said she was barely dilated to eight centimeters at that point.

Despite Skol’s statements to Pierce that her other children had been delivered when she was dilated to ten centimeters; he continued to insist she push, saying words to the effect of, “eight, nine, ten had nothing to do with it.”

Pierce continued with his cell phone calls, calling people “assholes” and telling someone to “kiss my ass.” He made comments such as “that stupid woman, she has no business being pregnant.”

Pierce inserted a catheter during one of Skol’s contractions, which was extremely painful.

Pierce threatened Skol with a cesarean section, stating, “this baby is coming out or it’s not” putting her in fear of either fetal distress or a cesarean. Pierce kept asking the nurse, “did you order enough blood? Because she is going to hemorrhage.” Skol found this terrifying.

Pierce caught the baby by her arm and leg almost dropping her, then held the baby up by one arm and leg for everyone to see.

Pierce proceeded to stitch Skol without adequate anesthesia and requested that Skol’s husband hold her down because she was squirming in pain. Not knowing what else to do, her husband held her down.

Skol repeatedly asked for pain medication during and after the delivery and the laceration repair. Pierce repeatedly denied the her any pain medication and was very rough when he cleaned Skol after the stitching, jabbing her with a sponge.

Pierce told the nurse that Skol deserved to feel pain because she had not called before coming in and that sometimes “pain is the best teacher.”

 

Hat tip: @lakeline

 Photo credit

Bookmark and Share       

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (38)

discusting..... inhumane caregiver (and that is not the worst I have heard)

July 22, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterbriome

Horrifying. That poor family, especially with the mention of their prior stillbirth.

July 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterEG

Really?! $500 and a slap on the wrist?! He practically tortures his own patients and gets fined $500!?

That is so disgusting. I am appalled.

July 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLiz

This shows me that a much higher authority needs to look more closely at the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation.

A big $500.00! What in the world are they thinking!

Here's a Sick Doctor that thinks that he's "Above the Law" and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation just confirmed that!

Cathy Skol is not alone in suing Pierce either! There have been other suits started too.

Pierce belongs in a straight jacket!

July 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRing A.

Was/is there a Civil suit in this case?

Professional organizations are designed to protect their own (even when gvt regulated - EX: big pharma).

The only way to stop this abhorrent behavior is by hitting them where it hurts - in the pocket and the only way to do that is with a civil suit unfortunately.

July 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterFyrestorm

honestly? this couple allowed this to happen to them! where was Mrs. Skols husband? My husband would've beat this guy to a pulp after I had a go at him after his first offense. And, baby #5? doesn't Mrs. Skol have a little experience giving birth? Ugh...both sides of this story disgust me.

July 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGE

Fyrestorm... yes! She's going to also proceed with the civil suit. There's a funny comment on the Chicago Breaking News article. "Sometimes a lawsuit is the best teacher." According to the allegations, Pierce told a nurse that he wanted Skol in pain because "sometimes pain is the best teacher." She, of course, needed to be taught a lesson to call the hospital first before coming in with frequent contractions.

Oy.

July 22, 2009 | Registered CommenterJill

That is some f*cked up sh*t. Wow.

And now I will attempt to pick my jaw up off of the floor.

July 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMM

GE, I've read over and over how partners often feel a sense of disenfranchised grief in trying to support the laboring woman and being "good patients." My question isn't where was the husband but where was the doula or patient advocate in the hospital? If her husband was wrapped up in the moment trying to support his wife, he might not have had the clarity to also fight off the alleged violent treatment.

July 22, 2009 | Registered CommenterJill

MM, they are allegations at this point, but there must have been some shred of truth if he was put on probation.

July 22, 2009 | Registered CommenterJill
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.